CONSUMER WARNING $2K Parliament Candidate Worse Odds Than Poker Machine
- MagnaChartaParty
- May 7
- 2 min read

One must "do it" to prove it irrefutably. So I did it as I'm not allowed to sue or advertise I'm labelled as conspiracy theorist - falsely & unjustly defamed criminally (falsely) while real conspiracy theorists LABOR & LIBERAL Party Faithful are lorded as heroes of truth, when they conspire to claim the "theory" that many false conspiracies - are made by people "claiming to" expose criminal activities in FREEMASONRY or GOVERNMENT - therefore those whistleblowers are conspiracy theorists.
Likewise - in my first-hand experience, this is water with a tinge of colour (below) "CHEAP AS CHIPS" shoe "polish" & "wax" false advertising - is breach of contract.
In my first-hand experience, FEDERAL Consumer FALSE ADVERTISING (etcetera) legislation protections in Australia are no different to every other Parliament made law (or legal precedent set by judges) - they're all maliciously false advertising created for a political ideological terrorist's cause to perpetuate the fraud that is Australia's DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT. Not limited to the imbalance in equality, we all know from recent experience of being 'allowed' to choose whether to vote above or below the line for Federal Senate. That system intentionally discriminates against "ungrouped independent candidates".
In my first-hand experience, Australia's laws are primarily bogus & based on the honour system. If you need to lodge a complaint under the FEDERAL Act, you must seek "permission" from your State Government, who are legally allowed to refuse you your statuary right to take legal action against a corporation.
In my first-hand experience, if you need to sue in your State pursuant to this Federal Law, despite having jurisdiction to hear the Federal matter, the State Supreme Court have prerogative to refuse you your statutory right to damages for malicious infringements & wilful refusal by any Australia based corporation to acknowledge your Consumer rights.
In my first-hand experience, if you need to sue an interstate corporation in Federal Law, you must seek permission from the office staff at Federal court to access your statutory right to damages - they usually refuse if you've self represented & are a member of the secret disadvantaged CASTE under the secret societies FREEMASON LORE in Australia.

FAKE DEMOCRACY in AUSTRALIA
In my first-hand experience, expanding on Australia's fake democratic voting system as noted above:
Australia's State & Federal government advertise our parliament voting system as being "FREE" yet each Federal candidate must pay $2,000.00 for the privilege of nominating as a candidate to parliament elections - ergo NOT FREE.
Federal candidates who get more than 4% of the quota (number of votes divided by 0.04) will get a bonus of $12,000.00 plus from Australian Electoral Commission who are allegedly independent of Government.
Voting success depends 100% on advertising candidates.
Those discriminated as being in the lowest social status (caste) are automatically refused the opportunity to advertise, guaranteeing the outcome of the voting system to favour those in Australia's (secretly) approved social status (caste).
Which ultimately means only LABOR & LIBERAL candidates will achieve the 4% quote - receiving over $12K for each candidate funded by non Government or opposition political party (all other candidates).

Janette Gail FRANCIS
Comments