How Would You Solve Our Housing Crisis?

Above: Lower House, Parliament, Canberra ACT where democracy is another word for "mock honesty" or "false honesty".for LABOR & LIBERAL Faithful, that includes Greens, Nationals, One Nation ... The psychopathically heartless arrogance of Australia's television industry is confirmed by the fact they air advertisements from global charities seeking donations from Australia to help homeless persons globally, when the vast majority of Australia is struggling to ward off homelessness themselves. I'm certain the intended psychological effect is to stop voters talking about the housing crisis by making TV viewers believe there is no crisis, it's ONLY them with financial issues due to redirected guilt from parliament to the voter's poor management of their income but not the true culprit - PARLIAMENT. Evidenced by fact, through TV news, we know more about global crimes in government than we do about crimes in our own government.

If I was given that task, I’d fund it with taxing top end & all the registered, so-called charities.

Above: How many times have you heard politicians say “we’re not responsible” it was “before our time”? When they know, but you don't know their “Ministers” are not individual people, their Minister's legal identity is part of the fake democracy. I hope I can make you create new "action potentials" in your brain - new ways of thinking as terrorists in parliament think in order to hoodwink (fool) you the voter. Diving into legal technicalities, otherwise known as Spin Doctoring, when an enactment of parliament ("Act" or law) cites the responsible minister for that Act, the parliament is in reality LEGALLY citing the department as being responsible for itself, not the elected representative promoted to Minister by the head of the elected representatives voted head by a small proportion of the voter's elected representatives. This legal technicality is proved by the registration of Australian Business Numbers & associated "Trading Names" (above). Did a light turn on for you? This is why every time I wrote to a MINISTER they referred the matter on to their DEPARTMENT & why I wrote many letters to prove it was not an anomonly limited to one Minister or one political Party. With my legal brain in gear & you, now thinking correctly & logically, like an adult - I now inform you that any reference to or inference of an individual in any Government ABN is technically unconstitutional. Note that pursuant to law, a "person" is also a "corporation". In every Act the "responsible" Minister must be amended to read "the member for (...) followed by (name)" whenever the Minister becomes some other elected member the Act must be amended to reflect the identity of that elected person as an individual. Presently all Acts that identity a "Minister" without that person's individual identity are illegal - not constitutional, ergo not "good government" as demanded in section 51 & 52 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act https://classic.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s52.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=good%20government

I say “so-called charities” as when I was homeless with my children living from our car in Adelaide (from ANZAC Day 2006 to early April 2008) a bloke from a well known charity in a marked vehicle used to park near us and sit watching us for hours on end. There'd be no others in the place we were & he met no other. He just sat in his car, too far to yell at him, but close enough to feel he was a pervert. I’m certain he was masturbating sitting in his marked charity vehicle watched us.

Once when we parked near some charity bins in Morphett Vale, cooking our dinner on a portable stove astride a small wood table on a flat concrete slab, (because it was drizzling with rain) near the overflowing bins. Some bloke in a marked charity vehicle rushed up, parked next to the charity bins, accused me of stealing from the bins and going through the dumped junk. We hadn't. He tried to stuff it all in, but when there was no more room he put it in the marked charity vehicle, calling the stuff “ours” as in his & the property of the charity.

Despite my asking, we'd not had any assistance from that so-called charity when we were homeless, but they manage to fund TV commercials seeking donations and run a fleet of marked vehicles, tax-free.

Like I said, if I was given the task to solve our housing crisis, I’d fund it with taxing top end & all the registered, so-called charities.

How I’d Solve Our Housing Crisis:

I’d make private rentals illegal to all but direct family.

I’d make all residential rentals the responsibility of the Federal Government, with rental costs limited to 20% of the renter’s income.

I’d also put a permanent ban on increasing building costs that consume any extra grants for home buyers on mid to low incomes

Think about it. Private rentals exist to make renters pay off the home loans for the landlords.

If Government were the only ones as landlords there would be no overpriced rental market & the rentals would virtually self fund.

They’d be a building boom with a steady flow of new builds, conversions & renovations. Win-win.

Janette GF